+91 94054 57145

urdupraja@gmail.com

Pimpalgaon Raja, Dist. Buldhana, M.S., India

Whistleblower Policy

1. Policy Overview & Objective

1.1 Objective

An essential pillar of accountability and transparency at Raja Education & Bahuuddeshiya Society is an institutional mechanism that enables staff, educators, volunteers, and stakeholders to voice legitimate concerns regarding serious malpractice or wrongdoing in an effective and responsible manner.

While it is a fundamental term of every employment arrangement that personnel will faithfully serve the society and safeguard legitimate confidential information, the society recognizes that if an individual discovers evidence of serious internal malpractice, they must be empowered to disclose it internally without any fear of reprisal, discrimination, or victimisation.

1.2 Scope of Policy

This policy is explicitly designed to enable all categories of employees, project workers, teachers, and field volunteers to raise high-level concerns internally regarding actions they reasonably believe constitute malpractice, impropriety, or ethical failures.

This policy specifically covers serious public-interest concerns, including but not limited to:

  • Financial malpractice, fraud, embezzlement, or misappropriation of corporate donor grants and public funds.
  • Falsification of institutional records, audit logs, or student enrollment data.
  • Illegal diversion or unauthorized commercial sale of free community relief supplies (e.g., books, school bags, medical masks, sanitizers, or food grains).
  • Gross non-compliance with statutory legal obligations, education board mandates, or state welfare statutes.
  • Actions that pose an immediate danger to public health, individual safety, or the local environment (e.g., hazardous management of vaccination camps or safety lapses in vocational training setups).
  • Criminal activities, extortion, or active bribery.
  • Deliberate attempts to conceal or destroy evidence related to any of the above infractions.

This policy is strictly intended to assist individuals who uncover systemic malpractice or ethical improprieties. It is not designed to question the standard administrative or financial decisions made by the Executive Management Committee, nor should it be used to re-verify personal grievances or matters that are already actively being addressed under standard harassment, POSH, or disciplinary procedures.

1.3 Document Control

  • Policy Code: REBS-WBP-2026-V1
  • Effective Date: May 18, 2026
  • Review Cycle: Annual

2. Core Operational Safeguards

2.1 Protection against Reprisal

This policy offers comprehensive institutional protection to any employee or volunteer who makes a disclosure, provided the submission is:

  • Made in absolute good faith.
  • Based on a reasonable and honest belief that the information highlights verifiable malpractice or a serious breach of ethics.
  • Submitted directly through the designated internal reporting channels described herein.

The society guarantees that no genuine whistleblower will be dismissed, demoted, penalized, or disadvantaged in their career progression as a direct result of making an internal good-faith disclosure.

2.2 Confidentiality

The society will treat every disclosure with the utmost sensitivity and discretion. The identity of the individual raising the concern will be kept confidential, provided that doing so does not legally impede, frustrate, or halt the necessary investigation process. If the investigation subsequently requires the whistleblower to provide a formal witness statement as part of legal or disciplinary evidence, the tracking officer will discuss this transparently with the individual prior to disclosure.

2.3 Anonymous Allegations

This policy strongly encourages whistleblowers to put their names to disclosures to ensure complete investigative clarity. Concerns raised completely anonymously carry less weight and are harder to verify; however, they may be reviewed and investigated at the sole discretion of the Executive Management Committee. In exercising this discretion, the committee will evaluate:

  • The absolute seriousness and nature of the issues raised.
  • The baseline credibility of the concern based on verifiable background facts.
  • The realistic likelihood of confirming the allegation through independent, attributable data sources.

2.4 Untrue or Vexatious Allegations

If an individual files an allegation in good faith that is subsequently unconfirmed by a thorough investigation, no retaliatory action whatsoever will be taken against them. However, if an investigation reveals that an individual has knowingly made false, malicious, or vexatious allegations—particularly if they persistently pursue a known falsehood—strict internal disciplinary action may be initiated against that specific individual.

3. Standard Procedures for Making a Disclosure

On receipt of a formal complaint regarding internal malpractice, the administrator or staff member who receives the information must document it and pass it as soon as practically possible to the designated investigating authority:

[Institutional Lapses] ──> Report to: School Headmaster / Principal

[Welfare/Project Lapses] ──> Report to: Designated Project Coordinator

[Executive/Higher Lapses]─> Report to: Secretary or President of the Society

  • Standard Channel: Complaints regarding on-site institutional malpractice must be investigated by the respective School Headmaster or Project Coordinator, unless the allegation is directly leveled against that specific administrator.
  • Escalation to Executive Management: If the complaint concerns or implicates a Headmaster or Project Coordinator, the disclosure must be routed directly to the Secretary of the Executive Management Committee for independent assignment.
  • Bypassing the Hierarchy: The complainant retains an absolute, unconditional right to bypass their immediate line management and file their disclosure directly with the President of the Society. The President reserves the right to refer the matter back to a neutral senior manager only if it is verified that management can execute the investigation entirely free from any conflict of interest.

4. Investigative & Judgment Protocol

Every assigned investigating officer must strictly adhere to the following operational phases:

  • Clarification Intake: Obtain complete, granular details, timelines, and documentation from the complainant during a secure intake session.
  • Notification of Accused: Inform the staff member against whom the complaint is made as soon as practically possible. The accused individual will be explicitly informed of their right to be accompanied by a neutral colleague or representative during any formal interview or hearing.
  • External & Auditor Involvement: If preliminary checks point toward significant financial fraud or criminal activity, the investigating officer must immediately consult with the President/Secretary to involve the society's legal advisors, certified auditors, or local law enforcement authorities.
  • Independent Evaluation: Proactively interview witnesses and review physical or digital logs. The investigator will form an objective judgment regarding the validity of the complaint.
  • Formal Written Report: The investigator will compile a comprehensive, written investigation report detailing all evidentiary findings, testimonies, and final conclusions. This report will be handed directly to the Executive Management Committee.
  • Executive Action: The President or Secretary will determine the final course of action. If the complaint is verified as justified, they will immediately initiate formal internal disciplinary actions, suspend the guilty parties, or launch external legal prosecution.
  • Complainant Feedback: All definitive outcomes, status updates, and resolutions will be provided to the complainant in writing and delivered safely to their designated personal address or secure email.

5. Escalation & Independent Points of Contact

Should a complainant feel that their concern cannot be safely voiced through regular administrative lines, or if they are unsatisfied with the internal investigation's conclusion, they may appeal directly to the independent members of the Governing Body:

Level 1: Primary Internal Review

  • Designated Authority: Secretary, Executive Management Committee
  • Head Office Address: Shakil Ahmad Urdu High School, Malvipura, Pimpalgaon Raja, District Buldhana, Maharashtra State, India.
  • Official Monitoring Email: urdupraja@gmail.com
  • Direct Emergency Helpline: +91 94054 57145

Level 2: Independent Governance Review

If standard internal pathways are exhausted or deemed unsuitable due to conflicts of interest, stakeholders may directly contact the appointed oversight members of the society's governing council:

Level Role / Oversight Function Contact Number Primary Communication Route
Tier 1
Senior Management Committee Member
+91 94054 57145
urdupraja@gmail.com
Tier 2
Independent Trust Board Overseer
+91 70207 34483
urdupraja@gmail.com

Level 3: Statutory Recourse

If an internal investigation concludes that an allegation is unsubstantiated, yet the complainant remains reasonably convinced that systemic malpractice persists, the society recognizes the legal and lawful right of individuals to take their disclosures to external prescribed authorities, statutory bodies, or judicial registrars under the Maharashtra Public Trusts framework.

This policy serves as a public declaration of Raja Education & Bahuuddeshiya Society’s unwavering commitment to financial clarity, professional ethics, and absolute institutional integrity.